Final Leaderboard

For the final test set, the quality results shown below were calculated in the same way as the results in the first, second, and third leaderboards. Since this year the main focus is on the speed followed by quality, this table is of secondary importance (but still important).

Rank	Team	Member(s)	Affiliation	Score mean	Execution time
1	DH-AISP	Jin Guo	Zhejiang Dahua Technology, China	0.7430840826267106	16.3 s
2	MiAlgo	Shuai Liu	Xiaomi Inc., China	0.7328499863843524	1.51 s
3	IVLTeam	Simone Bianco, Marco Buzzelli, Claudio Rota, Raimondo Schettini, Simone Zini	University of Milano - Bicocca	0.6712312575998751	5.8 s
4	SCBC	Lu Xu, Chao Zhang, Yasi Wang	SRC-B	0.6151388126619745	3.24 s
5	Photoshop manual enhancement	-	Organizers Team	0.5292079350680617	∞
6	BigGuy	Qirui Yang, Xianghui Li, Qihua Cheng, Fangpu Zhang, Zhiqiang Xu, Jingyu Yang	School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China Shenzhen MicroBT Electronics Technology Co., Ltd, Shenzhen 518000, China	0.4649042488465732	23.06 s
7	play1play	Shuwei Yue, Yuyang Liu, Minchen Wei	The Hong Kong Polytechnic University	0.4331759593258316	3.09 s
8	OzUVGL	Furkan Kınlı, Doğa Yılmaz, Barış Özcan, Furkan Kıraç	Özyeğin University Bahçeşehir University	0.3471445563004614	144.8 s
-	baseline	-	Organizers Team	0.3121188638282679	-
9	lingtao	Xianbin Liu, Rui Zheng	BOE	0.14607024542869917	1050 s

Additionally, execution times for single images were measured for the top 5 solutions in terms of quality and they can be seen in the table below. These results are to be considered as the most important ones for this year's challenge.

Rank	Team	Member(s)	Affiliation	Execution time
1	MiAlgo	Shuai Liu	Xiaomi Inc., China	1.51 s
2	SCBC	Lu Xu, Chao Zhang, Yasi Wang	SRC-B	3.24 s
3	IVLTeam	Simone Bianco, Marco Buzzelli, Claudio Rota, Raimondo Schettini, Simone Zini	University of Milano - Bicocca	5.8 s
4	DH-AISP	Jin Guo	Zhejiang Dahua Technology, China	16.3 s
5	Photoshop manual enhancement	-	Organizers Team	∞