Illumination Estimation Challenges

Final Leaderboard

For the final test set, the quality results shown below were calculated in the same way as the results in the first, second, and third leaderboards. Since this year the main focus is on the speed followed by quality, this table is of secondary importance (but still important).

Rank Team Member(s) Affiliation Score mean Execution time
1 DH-AISP Jin Guo Zhejiang Dahua Technology, China 0.7218876484895114 16.3 s
2 MiAlgo Shuai Liu Xiaomi Inc., China 0.7114492383595603 1.51 s
3 IVLTeam Simone Bianco, Marco Buzzelli, Claudio Rota, Raimondo Schettini, Simone Zini University of Milano - Bicocca 0.6458946471247096 5.8 s
4 SCBC Lu Xu, Chao Zhang, Yasi Wang SRC-B 0.5829452023917692 3.24 s
5 NPRchallenge2024 - Organizers Team 0.4989679112467103
6 BigGuy Qirui Yang, Xianghui Li, Qihua Cheng, Fangpu Zhang, Zhiqiang Xu, Jingyu Yang School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Shenzhen MicroBT Electronics Technology Co., Ltd, Shenzhen 518000, China
0.41618115149283974 23.06 s
7 play1play Shuwei Yue, Yuyang Liu, Minchen Wei The Hong Kong Polytechnic University 0.4012551827111636 3.09 s
8 OzUVGL Furkan Kınlı, Doğa Yılmaz, Barış Özcan, Furkan Kıraç Özyeğin University
Bahçeşehir University
0.3133577493878041 144.8 s
- baseline - Organizers Team 0.26345246567437197 -



Additionally, execution times for single images were measured for the top 5 solutions in terms of quality and they can be seen in the table below. These results are to be considered as the most important ones for this year's challenge.

Rank Team Member(s) Affiliation Execution time
1 MiAlgo Shuai Liu Xiaomi Inc., China 1.51 s
2 SCBC Lu Xu, Chao Zhang, Yasi Wang SRC-B 3.24 s
3 IVLTeam Simone Bianco, Marco Buzzelli, Claudio Rota, Raimondo Schettini, Simone Zini University of Milano - Bicocca 5.8 s
4 DH-AISP Jin Guo Zhejiang Dahua Technology, China 16.3 s
5 NPRchallenge2024 - Organizers Team